Tuesday, May 31, 2011

My Book and the "Spread The Word" Contest

Hi everyone,

I'm excited and nervous to announce that I have officially published my first collection, The Wild Grass and Other Stories, available on Amazon.

My excitement comes from the fact that this book contains my favorite and most personal short stories from my last ten years of writing. My nervousness comes mostly from my fear of the unknown. I'm not sure if anybody will care about this book. I'm not sure if anyone will want to read it. But I feel ready to do this. The time has come.

Here's the cover:



Here's a list of some things in the book that I hope you will find cool:

1. a Buddhist exorcism
2. a ghost chase
3. phallocrypts
4. first, second, and third person POV
5. the line "The days passed, one by one, like the repeated washing of a shirt."
6. pink dolphins
7. a stomach stapling brochure
8. characters with names like Kalaya and Subscription
9. a Brazilian gold mine
10. my secrets

I hope you will give my book a chance by buying and reading it. I am very grateful for anyone who does.

Thank you!

___________________________________________

As a self-publisher, my biggest worry is that the people who might be interested in this book might not know it exists. With that in mind, I'm holding a contest to get you to help me spread the word. You don't need to buy anything to help me. All you have to do is tell people about the book.

Davin's "Spread The Word" Contest

To enter the contest, tell a friend about my book and ask them to e-mail me at dmalasarn (at) gmail (dot) com with the following message pasted in the body of the e-mail:

Dear Davin Malasarn,

I heard about your collection The Wild Grass and Other Stories from (have them write YOUR name here) on sale at Amazon ( http://amzn.to/kwfpap ). I understand that this collection includes your most emotional work and will take readers to exotic locations all around the world.

Signed,
(have them write THEIR name here)

~~~~~~~~~

Your friends should insert your name in the first slot above and their name in the second slot.

Simple enough?

I'm giving away three prizes:

Top Prize is a rigorous full manuscript critique (up to ~70,000 words) by me, including two additional critiques of your first ten pages by my epic and talented co-bloggers, Scott G.F. Bailey and Michelle Davidson Argyle. This prize will be given to the person who is responsible for getting the most people to send me entries, counted by the number of times your name appears in the first name slot. You can exchange this for a $100 gift card to any location of your choice if you prefer.

Second Prize is a 50-page manuscript critique by me or a $30 gift card to a bookstore of your choice. This winner will be selected at random from among all of the people whose names appear in the first name slot.

Third Prize is a $50 gift card to a bookstore of your choice. This winner will be selected at random from among the people who e-mail me (the second name slot in the message).

The contest will run until midnight on June 30, 2011. Both people who spread the word and people who e-mail me are eligible to win prizes. Thank you to everyone who has supported me in the past and who supports me now. I also want to thank Scott, Michelle, F.P. Adriani, Marie Shield, and Troy Nethercott in general for being there for me. It means so much to me.

Friday, May 27, 2011

Friday Filler: Pointless Rambling!

I've been reading some new novels and some old novels the last couple of years, and I think I've noticed something worth mentioning. Yes, whenever I notice anything I think it's worth mentioning because of my tremendous ego, but this might actually be important. Anyway, if you compare the books of D.H. Lawrence and Samuel Beckett and Virginia Woolf with the books of Salman Rushdie and Philip Roth and Jhumpa Lahiri and Iain McEwen, for example, you might think that the older books (hell, Lawrence and Woolf did some of their most famous writing ninety years ago) are, well, old-fashioned and that the more recent books have their finger on the pulse of modern life. You might think that because modern writers are more casual in the way they write about sex, and appear to have less respect for the form of the novel, and are awash in a sea of metafictional irony, that they are more sophisticated than their forebears. And you know what? You'd be wrong.

For some time now, bouncing as I do from reading the most recent literary fiction to the classic works of the Western Canon, I have been feeling that something in today's novels is lacking. And what that is, I have come to see, is emotional depth and honesty. Yes, you have protagonists in Roth who are not charming and have selfish motivations and you've got people fucking around behind their significant others' backs in every other novel these days and you've got antiheroes and you've got explorations of madness and you've got people who are conflicted and hide their true feelings and you've got the constant irony of people not really knowing anything about those closest to them and being surprised when their One True Love is leaving them. But that's all very old stuff, and books that were written ninety years ago explored all of this already, and did a Much Better Job Of It and got A Lot Closer To The Emotions of the Characters.

Nowadays everybody who's writing literature is giving knowing looks and winks and there is a lot of insincerity and holding-at-arm's-length of characters and their emotions, and I think more of it's being presented as a sort of prettily written but clichéd entertainment (or--worse yet--social statement) than a real exploration of life. Freedom bothered me a lot because all of the action seemed to take place behind a wall of glass, as if Franzen was putting on a puppet show but didn't actually care a whit about his characters and really didn't want to get too close to them. They'll admit that they sometimes despise themselves and each other and that they're really all very selfish people, but that's as deep as the analysis goes. And I see that over and over in book after book. Modern writers, I have decided, are writing in too shallow a manner, too cowardly.

This is all a bit rough and not well thought out, I know. It's something I'm working on. But it does seem significant that Virgina Woolf and David Lawrence, writing ninety years ago, were able to expose more truths about the human heart than anyone writing today seems to be able to do. Literary writers of today: we aren't trying hard enough.

Thursday, May 26, 2011

Don't expect only compliments

I have the reputation of being a nice guy, at least according to some people. I also have the reputation of being a quiet guy. For me, the two often go hand in hand because I tend to live by the rule "if you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all."

This is probably still good advice for the most part, but honestly I'm finding myself more bored by it than anything else. To only compliment other writers doesn't make for very lively interactions, and, sadly, I often treat book reviews I see by other writers as meaningless.

So, I've changed my stance.

I'm being more open with my opinions about other writers and agents and editors. And I have a greater respect for my peers who act the same way. There are definitely some honest reviewers out there, and I hope they know that I appreciate them.

Last week, Man Booker Judge Carmen Callil retired from the judging panel after the prize was given to writer Philip Roth. Beyond my own opinions of whether or not I think Roth is deserving of the prize, I appreciated the story being made public because 1. I'm tired of everyone always playing nice-nice, and 2. it made me think about my own opinions of what makes good or bad writing.

We shouldn't be afraid of bad reviews. When I look at book reviews, which I tend to do more often now, I find that both good and bad reviews can get me interested in a book. With bad reviews, I often want to buy a book because I'm pretty sure I'll disagree with the reviewer. Showing me a bad review written by a bad reviewer is probably the best way to get me to read a book!

And I'm pretty sure a lot of us writers are desperately seeking honest feedback. When I did my Tiger Mother reviews some time ago, I got a lot more people requesting the harsh review over the nice one. And the reviews people gave me for my own passage made me think harder about my writing. They made me a better writer (even if I was calling them names in my head).

Being honest about our opinions also gives us more credibility. I value the words of someone who I think is honest much more than someone who is always nice. I want my own words to have that sort of weight, so I'm going to be honest when I see bad writing, and I hope I'm going to be trusted when I talk about good writing.

I worry a bit about writing this post now, just a few days before I publish my collection The Wild Grass. Will this mean that everyone gives me bad reviews, and will this keep other people from buying my book? After thinking about it, though, I realize that I'm okay with whatever happens. If people are like me, the bad reviews might get them more interested in my work. For my own development, a bad review might make me a better writer.

Wednesday, May 25, 2011

Thinking in Nonlinear Terms

I don't know about you, but I don't read books backwards. I also don't write them backwards, or out of any sort of order. I write from Page One all the way to The Last Page, and that's that. I usually edit as I go. When I read, it's still from Page One all the way to The Last Page (imagine that). Sometimes, if I like a book enough, I'll finish it and go back to re-read specific scenes that seemed especially poignant to me. Sometimes I'll underline them and make notes in the margins.

The past few days I've been reading a book that has a linear plotline, but it's told in such a way that I see the story outside of itself, in a nonlinear way. I have to admit this fascinates me to no end. I don't even know if I can do it justice in any sort of description, or if I'd ever be able to pull off something like that. Still, I think it's fun to explore. Some things I've noticed are:

Plot Doesn't Matter So Much
I've noticed that the stories I fall in love with the most always exist outside of plot. Plot matters - in linear terms, at least. When you start to think about story outside of linear existence, things become clearer. For instance, in the novel I'm reading, the plot is so ridiculously simple that all I can say about it is that someone dies and people think about it (and a lot of other things). It's so unlike the novels you see being published by the thousands these days (including my own stuff!) that it's like a breath of fresh air. As it did in college, it's opening my eyes just a bit wider as to what storytelling really is, what it can be, and what I can do to improve my own storytelling skills.

The Storytelling is the Story
I tend to think about my novel, Monarch, in a sort of cycle that goes somewhat like this: This story is so commercial. It's about a spy. Whoopdedoo. It's nothing special. Typical thriller. But. Wait. No, it's different. I'm telling this story in a different way than you see most spy thrillers told. It's sitting on the edge of something else. It's unique. It's worth reading because the way I tell the three interweaving stories is part of the actual story. As crazy as that sounds.

I don't know if that makes any sense, but what I'm trying to get at is that form can be as much a story as plot, character, and all those other elements. It can be its own story, and that's so exciting to me that I almost salivate in anticipation just thinking about writing or reading anything with that application. I barely brush on it in Monarch, but it's there.

The Language Loses You
I'll admit that the book I'm reading now scares me. A lot. I'll get lost sometimes. Confused. What is this author doing? The fact that I keep reading and can't stop turning the pages says something. The way words string together, the images playing in my head, I could care less where the heck the story is going, what's happening, who the characters are. I'm lost in the words, and I love it. For awhile, when I finish a book like this, I feel kind of cheated in straight linear fiction, which is almost like wading in a shallow pool rather than the deepest part of the ocean. It's where my love of fiction truly took form when I was studying in college. That ocean. That place where words are words are words, and like a stripped bone, they gleam bright under the sun and make you squirm. They make you grow.

I've rambled on long enough. I think one of the points I'm getting at here is to not necessarily write or read in nonlinear terms, but think in nonlinear terms. When that happens, you start to step outside of a box you probably didn't even realize surrounded you. I'll be talking more about this book and telling you the title and author in one of the Literary Lab's first podcasts. So keep an eye out!

What about you? Do you try to think of storytelling outside the box? Does this scare you? Fascinate you? Does anything I've said make sense at all?

Monday, May 23, 2011

"Mrs Dalloway" by Virginia Woolf

I am reading Mrs Dalloway, Virginia Woolf's 1925 stream-of-consciousness novel. Clarissa Dalloway (aged 52, London socialite, married to a high-ranking government official and mother of a daughter, Elizabeth) is planning a party. On the morning of the party her household whirs along like a well-oiled machine, servants polishing silver and arranging furniture and laying in supplies. Things are looking pretty good for Mrs Dalloway. On her return from a brief walk (during which traffic has stopped as a limousine carrying--perhaps--the Queen of England passes down the street) Mrs Dalloway receives two shocks: first, she learns that her husband has been asked to lunch--alone--by a witty and popular noblewoman and second, she is visited by Peter Walsh, who was her beau some 33 years ago and has come to tell Clarissa that he's in love. The story continues from there.

The narrative is almost entirely made up of internal dialogue; there is very little in the way of descriptive prose or dramatized scenes. Clarissa goes for a walk. A couple sits in the park. Clarissa is visited by Peter Walsh. Peter goes and naps in the park. That's the first half of the book and it sounds pretty dull if you just relate it in terms of events. And if you were to ask what the central conflict is, what the story question is ("Will X manage to do Y before Z happens?"), I'd have to say that there really isn't one.

And yet this book is constantly moving, sucking me in and carrying me along and I'm reading it really quickly to see what comes next. It's all, as I say, taking place in the minds of the characters, and that's precisely what gives life to the events. The reaction of a neighborhood to the possibility that the Queen is being driven past them, within arm's reach even, and what it means to be a Londoner in 1923 is far more interesting than the action of the Queen being driven past. More sly on Woolf's part is how the attention of the patriotic crowd is drawn from the Queen (if it's her in the limousine) to a plane sky-writing an advertisement for toffee. The marketing is more immediately interesting than the confused emotions surrounding patriotism and nationalism and nobody is even looking when the royal car finally drives through the gates of Buckingham Palace. Peter Walsh, when he's walking to the park after having visited Clarissa, gets distracted by a pretty girl and he follows her discretely for some blocks, building up an elaborate fantasy life between him and the girl and then she goes into her house and it's all over and Walsh mourns that he's had such an adventure but couldn't possibly share it with anyone because it's all made up and a bit sordid, you know. And on like that and all of it's absolutely true to the life of the mind and fascinating.

It's all telling, too, not showing. This novel, in fact, violates many of the Rules that are widely promulgated about writing. I might go so far as to say that it proves the rules wrong:

You do not need to have a clear central conflict.

You do not need to have a "story question."

You do not need to have a single point-of-view per scene.

You do not need to avoid flashbacks.

You do not need to delay supplying backstory until after a conflict is established.

I will say, of course, that in order to get away with all of the rule-breaking listed above, you need to have absolute control over your form, you need to have a sophisticated and honest understanding of the human heart, you must be a brave writer and you must write absolutely beautiful prose. Then again, you should have all of those qualities anyway as a writer.

Friday, May 20, 2011

Friday Filler: Talking and Talking

It's Friday Filler because I want one!

Scott, Michelle, and I were up until the late hours of the night talking about books and our next anthology project and food. We'll be explaining more on this soon, and I'm excited!

I've also been hatching plans with the fantastic deWishes delights to make a fun custom-made writing-related cake truffle set for some blog reader to coincide with the release of my short story collection in June. deWishes delights is co-founded by the most wonderful and passionate and animal-loving person, Michelle "Mishy Fishy" Tseng, who also works as a physical sciences and reading teacher. Really, she's the coolest! Hi Mishy! (If you want more updates on my book, sign up for my mailing list over on the right. I'd appreciate it.)



Lastly, for anyone who's in the area, I'll be reading this Sunday at noon at the Silver Lake Jubilee. I'm going to surprise the organizers a little bit by reading an unpublished story from my collection called "Dogs: Wet & Dry" that describes a love triangle between a French woman, a dog, and a goose. If I get up the courage I'll be using different voices! (The fact that they anticipate 35,000 people at the Jubilee probably means I won't have the courage.)

What cool and quirky and awesome and ridiculous and scrumptious things is everyone up to?

Wednesday, May 18, 2011

Save Bookstores Day

My agent, Weronika Janczuk, forwarded this email to me a week or so ago and I forgot to post about it here:

Hi everyone,

I’ve gotten sick of reading the bookstore obituaries in the publishing news, so I’m starting a viral campaign to get people, on one day, to go buy books from their local bookstore. Might not end up changing the tides, but it’s something small I can do and I’m getting a good response so far. Here are the details for you to pass on to your friends/family/fellow booklovers:

Who: You and all the book-lovers in your life
When: June 25th, the first Saturday of Summer!
Where: Your local bookstore (and if you don’t have one near you, Powell’s ships)
Why: Because bookstores are dropping like flies and we want them to stay alive

Thanks for passing this along to whomever you think would want to get on board.

Warmest,
Kelly

Kelly Sonnack
Andrea Brown Literary Agency



Prefer to read on your god-damned Walmazart Kindle? Then buy a book for a book-lover you know!

Mark your calendars! DO IT!

Tuesday, May 17, 2011

Maybe Romance is More Than You Thought

Today we're talking about the romance genre. Yes. Romance. Here on the lab! I'd like to welcome Liz Borino, author of Expectations, a novel from LazyDay Publishing. She has some really interesting insights about romance that I think you should read.

The Romance Genre

Contemporary Romance. Romance, Lazy Day? Really? This was my initial (internal) reaction when I asked my newly acquired publisher how they’d classify my debut novel, Expectations. I envisioned the category of literary fiction or just mainstream fiction in the vein of Michael Cunningham. When I thought of romance books, I thought of predictable plotlines and shirtless men on the covers. Don’t get me wrong, I like shirtless men with ripped abs and a happy trail as much as the next straight woman… What was I talking about? My books and the romance genre, right. I decided to do some research before I stomped my bratty writer’s foot and calmly discussed changing the genre with Lazy Day.

The Romance Writers of America define the overall romance genre as having two main elements, “A Central Love Story: The main plot centers around two individuals falling in love and struggling to make the relationship work. A writer can include as many subplots as he/she wants as long as the love story is the main focus of the novel. An Emotionally-Satisfying and Optimistic Ending: In a romance, the lovers who risk and struggle for each other and their relationship are rewarded with emotional justice and unconditional love.”

Well…yeah. Expectations and its sequel, What Money Can’t Buy, actually focus on two couples, Chris and Aiden and Matt and Carley. To say their relationships are put through trials would be an understatement. As for the optimistic ending, I believe that’s important you have as many dark themes as I do.

The Romance Genre allows for as many storylines as an author’s creativity can come up with. Looking around the RWA website, I became more and more impressed with not only the quality and variety of writing from the other authors within the genre, but the community. So now, with the impending release of What Money Can’t Buy, I’m proud to call myself a Contemporary Romance author. Now where’s my man with a six pack?

Hah! I love it, Liz! Thank you so much. I think that romance has such a stigma attached to it that many writers aren't willing to look past that stigma to see the possibilities behind that genre. I'm excited about your new book, Money Can't Buy Can't Buy!

Liz is with LazyDay, a small publisher I have talked about over on The Innocent Flower. 

So, Liz, how did you get signed with a small publisher?

I got tired of querying and getting form rejections, so I began exploring other options. As much as I liked the idea of the control of self-publishing, I felt Expectations should be put out by a publisher to give it more 'cred'. A few weeks after I made that decision, Lazy Day began following me on Twitter. From there, I queried and two months later was accepted.

Since you've been with a small publisher, do you have plans to move on eventually? Have you felt the need for an agent?

No, to the agent. If I made a move it would be to self publish. There wouldn't be so much uncertainty. Though, Lazy Day is wonderfully supportive and I don't plan to leave anytime soon, unless they get weary of my neurosis!

That's fantastic! I love my small publisher, too. It's no wonder many authors are going that route these days. Can you tell us a little bit about your first book with them?

Expectations blurb: Ourselves and our familial obligations. The struggle is personified by Chris and Matt Taylor, identical twins, who are trying to win their overbearing father’s approval and acquire their trust funds. Love, money, and desire collide as Matt and Chris decide what’s really important to them.

Can you tell us what's for you on the horizon after your second book release?

Oh wow, um, well I've already started the third book, and I'm building my PR business to help other authors and different kinds of artists promote themselves

That's great! Do you plan to keep writing in the romance genre?


Thanks! It seems my stories tend to have romantic themes to them and I intend to keep this series going as long as makes sense.

It does! Thank you so much, Liz, for guest blogging with us today. You can find Liz on her Author Site and on Facebook. Her second novel, What Money Can't Buy, will be up on Amazon soon for purchase. You can find Expecations here.

To WIN a free eBook of Expectations by Liz Borino, simply leave a comment here! We'll choose a winner and let them know by email that they've won. Thanks, everyone!

Monday, May 16, 2011

Adapting To The Changing World (Of Publication)

I didn't get a cell phone until 2009.

I don't have a Kindle or a Nook or an iPad.

I don't even have a computer. (Okay, this last one's not true, but it helps me make my point.)

For the most part, I've approached technology with the mindset that if it isn't broken, don't fix it. As a writer starting out ten years ago, I wanted to write a good book, send it to a literary agent, have the agent find me a publisher, and then have the publisher get the book to my favorite book store. This model worked for other people, and I figured it would work for me.

As I learned more about the current publishing climate, though, I understood that I needed to be more willing to promote myself. So, I started a blog. That was fun! I met people I liked exchanging ideas with. I liked the support system.

But, then I was learning that there was more to blogging than just blogging.

You could, for example, respond to other people's comments. You could have blog tours. You could have blog awards. Slowly, I forced myself to learn about each of these things. Then, Facebook came along.

And Twitter.

There were people promoting their books all over the place. I set up a Facebook account. I found "friends." I set up a Twitter account. I talked about things like peanut butter and book shelves. But, you know what? Book trailers came along. eBooks came along. Goodreads came along.

It was very overwhelming for me to educate myself about these many different avenues through which writers could sell themselves. I was frustrated because I couldn't figure out which route was the best one to take. For me, this led to paralysis. For three years I couldn't decide if I wanted to self-publish or publish through a publishing house. I couldn't decide if I wanted an agent or if I should try to find an editor on my own or if I should publish on my own. I couldn't even decide on what I wanted to write after being told no one buys short story collections or novellas or epics or books written in third person omniscient. While I continued to write through this frustrating time, I stopped making any effort to make my work available to the people who mattered to me most: readers. I was doing everything and nothing. All possibilities tempted me, but I couldn't commit to any one because I was always afraid that another path was better.

Finally, though, I've come to understand something. The thing I'd been searching for, the "right" choice, didn't exist. I had fooled myself. Instead, what I was facing was a series of viable paths, some of them diverging for a while, some of them converging again. And, what was key for me to realize was that there was no end point to any of these paths. In other words, I had been trying to reach a destination that didn't exist.

It's not, "Choose the right way to publish and everything will work out." Rather, it's more like, "What worked for someone today may or may not work for someone else tomorrow." And, the equally important, "What didn't work for someone today may or may not work for someone else tomorrow." And, the equally equally important, "What may or may not work for someone today may or may not work for that same person tomorrow."

The path to success is a path, not a destination. Making yourself happy, sharing your art, or whatever your goals are, requires constant adjustment along this changing path. We will all be making decisions in our writing careers. I challenge you not to see those decisions as right or wrong, but as just another span in an ever-flowing path that is your writing career. It will ebb and flow but it will never freeze unless you let it.

Wednesday, May 11, 2011

Really Really Cool and Awesome Mailing Lists

Hi everyone!

I just wanted to mention today that I created a mailing list for myself, and if you're interested in receiving the occasional newsletter from me you can sign up for it over on the right side of this page. Since I'm planning on publishing some of my own work in the upcoming months, I've been thinking it would be nice to have the list for announcements. (I think I'll be keeping the self-promo on this blog to a minimum.) I'll also be including other content that I hope is useful to both writers and readers. And, there will likely be prizes thrown in there somewhere as well.

You can also see over on the right that Lit Lab and Michelle both have mailing lists available. The Lit Lab mailing list will keep you updated on our annual writing contests and anthologies (and other projects that are currently in the works)!

Thank you very much to anyone who signs up. I really do appreciate your support. For those of you who have been with me from the beginning, you'll know that I've been thinking of self-publishing ever since I started this blog. I'm finally taking the plunge, and I'm grateful to anyone who thinks it's cool rather than stupid.

Finally, for those of you who didn't see on Facebook, I wanted to show off my nice new cannibal mug that Scott so kindly designed for me. Woohoo! I have yet to drink from it because I want my first time to be really special. Thanks, Baimonster!

Tuesday, May 10, 2011

The Danger Zone - When You Go Insane With Editing

I have a dear friend whom I've never met in person. She's pretty much made of Pure Awesome, like all of my friends are. I must admit, though, that I wanted to smack her upside the head the other day. We were talking on Skype and she started telling me about the final personal edits she's doing on a book of hers before sending it in to her editor.

So, Michelle, I'm doing all these searches for to-be verbs and the word "was" and "that" and adverbs, and all that crap. What about this paragraph? I've written "was" in this paragraph EIGHT times. I've got to get rid of some!

I read through the paragraph. There was nothing wrong with it. I would have written it differently according to my own style, but it was beautiful writing. I didn't want to change a word. It got her point across just fine. I proceeded to glare at her over the camera. Sorry, Dear Friend. You know I love you. I think she'd crossed that line - you know, the one where you go kind of INSANE with editing your own work?

There's a point where we need to let go. I know I've whipped out the huge magnifying glass and started looking at my work like it's something to be completely dissected and ripped apart. Like you're ever going to get it back together into something recognizable...hah!

Danger Zone: When you start looking at the number of specific words in every single paragraph in your book. Too many "thats!" you cry, and start hitting the delete button like a crazy person. You start fixing things everywhere, and out of order. Then you realize that you've changed something back there that will affect something up here that will affect something over there. Crap.You've created a mess. So you do more editing, and before you know it three months have passed and you should have just rewritten the book from scratch.


Yes, I drew that picture with my limited drawing skills. Don't make fun of it.

I'm just saying there is a point where we step over the line. If you're serious about traditional publication, an editor will take your manuscript and make it all shiny and pretty. (If you want to publish your own work, hire an editor if you can.) If there's an ugly WAS glaring somewhere, they'll nix it. Some things are just too small to spend three months stressing over.

Use your common sense and be aware that if you're entering Danger Zone territory, maybe you should call up a good friend and have them talk you down from that delete-frenzy ledge. You know, when you start to go cross-eyed and think every sentence you write is utter crap? Yeah, I know you've been there. I have, too.

Monday, May 9, 2011

How Sincere Is Your Writer's Face?

Happy Monday, everyone!

Today, I wanted to talk about how we present ourselves as writers. I think we've all programmed ourselves, at least to some extent, to be humble about our writing and our writing experience. I know I always think twice before I announce how proud I am about a current project I'm working on. Not only that, but I often make jokes about my writing, making my work seem silly when really I've worked hard to make it something special.

My cannibal story comes to mind. Thinking back on the last several months when I've talked about the project, I realize that almost always I've made jokes about it. In reality, though, Bread is a very personal and serious story for me, one that I did a lot of research on, one that caused a lot of nightmares for me, and one that depicts a lot of very personal intimate experiences.

Somehow, I convinced myself that no one wanted to hear about the serious side of my work. I felt the need to joke about it because I wanted to talk about it, and making jokes was my idea of harnessing my enthusiasm into something acceptable.

When I was in high school, my English teacher talked a lot about false humility. It was a recurring theme in her class. She didn't exactly say that it was good or bad to be falsely humble, but she asked us simply why we felt the need to do it.

Why do we feel the need to do it?

My answer? For one thing, I think most people feel like it's polite to be humble. We don't want to seem too into ourselves. I think maybe we also don't want people to think we're stupid. We're worried that if we suddenly say we're proud of something we do, then people will assume we think we're better than Mark Twain or someone. (Maybe we are, and maybe we're not. That's beside the point.) There's a protective aspect to being falsely humble as well. We risk less because, if anyone else puts down our work, we can claim that we already knew it was bad.

This makes me sad. I'm sad that more people don't come out to say how good their work is. I'm also sad that many writers are so frightened that they feel the need to be falsely humble. And, I wonder: does putting your work down eventually convince other people that your work should be put down? Lately, I suspect this to be the case.

I do think a lot of us sincerely suffer from lack of confidence. That's a different issue, that I also wish would go away. But, for today, I just hope that we as writers feel like it's okay to take pride in our work and to announce that pride to each other. Honestly, one of the things that makes me happiest is when I see people in the blog-o-sphere, not talking about their awards or publishing news, but talking about how happy and proud they are of their work. Those are the announcements that make me want to learn more about a writer and what they've done. If they are proud of their work, then I feel like I can see a true reflection of what they want to produce, their artist's vision, rather than something "in training".

So, are you proud of your work? Are you proud enough to announce it to the world?

(As a semi-related aside, last week on Twitter, I saw a post by an agent that went something like "Be aware than anything you say and do at a writer's conference has the potential to permanently damage your career." That really made me angry. I hope we as writers aren't so scared that we worry about every single move we make. I am happy to know that there are better agents out there, people who aren't trying to train us to be cowering wimps as this man was trying to do.)

Friday, May 6, 2011

Friday Filler...Why You Procrastinate

There are lots of reasons why you might procrastinate, but I'll provide you with these two things to help you procrastinate even more on this fine Friday morning. When you're finished watching and reading, you might have discovered something really interesting about yourself - and human nature in general.

Article: How Pressure and Stress Are Affecting Your Performance

Video: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us

Thursday, May 5, 2011

Cinco de Mayo

Happy Cinco de Mayo! Today is not Mexican Independance Day, though. That's in September. Today celebrates the Mexican army's victory over the French army in 1862. I have no idea what they were fighting about. But let's forget about the military conflict and read Octavio Paz or Carlos Fuentes and eat spicy food while drinking tequila. As a literary activity.

Wednesday, May 4, 2011

Does an authorial voice really exist?

Yesterday, Anne Gallagher, Michelle, Scott and I tried an experiment that involved having readers try to match the writer to the writing for 4 short excerpts. (If you still want to guess, feel free to comment on the post before reading further.) The idea to do this stemmed from a discussion over at Scott's place about voice. We had several ideas running. The first was that the narrator's voice may vary with the story, but does writing also have an underlying "authorial voice" or style that a writer can't necessarily hide? Does this authorial voice always peek through? Is it limited by, say, the writer's own vocabulary, intellect, and experiences?

I was surprised to see the wide range of guesses we got. Only one person, Alex, got the right answer (woohoo!), although Scott and Michelle would have also guessed correctly. (Anne, would you have gotten it right as well?)

The correct answer is:

1. Scott
2. Anne
3. Michelle
4. Domey

Honestly, I was surprised by what a hard time everyone had on it, including myself. My own guess was wrong, as I switched Scott's and Anne's samples. I realize, then, that the elements I look at in someone's writing are not necessarily what other people, including the writers themselves, look at.

My reasoning behind my guesses will probably seem odd, as your reasoning will probably sound odd to me...although we would love it if you would describe that reasoning. For me, I easily identified Michelle as the writer of 3 because of the description "long, thin body lying limp" and the word "fluttered". I didn't need to read much further than that. Naturally, I knew which one I wrote. I had a harder time trying to decide between Anne and Scott for the first two samples, and I finally decided Scott didn't write the first one because of the use of the words "foolishly" and "foolish", a form of repetition that I personally use a lot, but one I wouldn't have guessed Scott would like. I credited it to Anne.

As I was trying to decide, I also considered things like sentence structure, as well as logic. I am more familiar with Scott's writing than Anne's, and I have seen a certain extended logical thought process in Scott's writing exemplified by lines such as "Algiers is a dangerous city, especially for men who take employment with the French oppressors". But, I detected the same kind of logic in the extended metaphor in the second paragraph of sample 2.

What this makes me realize in myself is that what I consider to be that "authorial voice" has to do with vocabulary, sentence structure, explanations of logic, and rhythms. I didn't pay much attention to subject matter, or to character. But, of course, the criteria are apparently different for everyone, given the different answers. And, so, I'm still left wondering, What makes up an authorial voice, and is there really such a thing?

Granted, this experiment had some flaws to it. The writing samples are short, and if the authorial voice has more to do with the limits of the writers ability--which I tend to think it does--then the short sample probably doesn't yet reach the boundaries of those limits. What would happen if you read multiple books by any of us? I'd bet those limits would become much more obvious.

And, how exactly did we choose our samples? I bet if any of us had wanted to, we could have picked writing samples that were more misleading and/or random. I can't speak for the others, but I'll say that for me, there was no value in that. I decided to choose two writing samples that I felt reflected polished work in its final state. Often times my early drafts are much more tainted by other writers' voices, and I hoped that these samples of mine were rid of such things...although I still see some McCarthy in my second sample. What was important to me was to show what I considered to be my best work in the hopes that people would reveal commonalities in it that I didn't necessarily see before or that people would reaffirm that the elements I consider to be mine were actually apparent. Neither one seemed to be the case.

The other complication is that voice comes on many levels. As we discussed at Scott's blog, there's always the narrative voice or the narrator's voice. This probably varies with the story. If there's also an authorial voice, the extent to which that authorial voice makes itself visible will also vary. In my own work, I personally try to hide that, aiming more for the invisible author. I would have said that in the books I've read by Scott, his authorial voice is more visible, more poetic. Michelle is more visible and poetic to me as well. I would have said Anne was less visible, based on these samples.

Do we care? Well, you tell me. If you were the one to put two samples up, would you prefer that readers could pick your work out right away or that they couldn't? I'm very much on the fence with this question. I do like the idea that I can write broadly. One of my favorite compliments is hearing someone say that they thought one of my stories was written by a woman or by someone other than who I am. At the same time, I was honestly a little disappointed that only three people assigned the 4th sample correctly to me. Those stats, in case you are interested are below:

For sample 1:
6 people correctly assigned it to Scott.
4 people assigned it to Domey.
3 people assigned it to Anne.
0 people assigned it to Michelle.

For sample 2:
5 people assigned it to Michelle.
4 people assigned it correctly to Anne.
4 people assigned it to Scott.
0 people assigned it to Domey.

For sample 3:
6 people assigned it to Domey.
4 people assigned it correctly to Michelle.
2 people assigned it to Anne.
1 person assigned it to Scott.

For sample 4:
4 people assigned it to Anne.
4 people assigned it to Michelle.
3 people assigned it correctly to Domey.
2 people assigned it to Scott.

One strong point in terms of identifying the components that make up voice might be to look at the writers who were ruled out of certain samples. No one thought Michelle wrote 1. No one thought Domey wrote 2. Obviously, there are elements there that people don't associate with these writers.

What about spread? Is there significance to there being slightly less spread in sample 1 versus sample 4? Does 1 maybe have a more prominent voice compared to 4? Is the author of 1 more visible than the author of 4?

I also wonder if factors like credibility came into play. Did people assign their favorite passage to the writer they respect the most? Their least favorite to the writer they respect the least? Did our personalities have anything to do with it? Did our past blog posts have anything to do with it? Can I possibly ask any more questions?

So, tell us your thoughts!

Tuesday, May 3, 2011

Heather Or Eels? An Experiment!

We have cooked up a little experiment for you here at the Literary Lab. It's been some time since we've done anything like this, so hopefully you're rested up and ready to participate, because you are an integral part of this experiment.

Here's the deal:

1. We will present prose excerpts from four writers, and tell you who wrote what.

2. We will present prose excerpts from the same four writers, in a different order, and not tell you who wrote what.

3. You will compare the examples and tell us who wrote which of the unidentified excerpts.

4. We'll talk about this tomorrow, based on the results. We have no idea what those results will be or what conclusions we'll draw, but we're Very Excited to find out!

Here we go!

From Michelle Davidson Argyle:

The light along the gulf’s horizon melted twice before the search for Edna was reconciled. She was found bruised and naked amidst a tangle of bright green seaweed. Along with the sand and crushed shells crusted against her salted body were creamy white feathers, twisted and broken. Two mornings before, the search began when Edna did not show for the meal she had so discourteously requested. After Edna’s clothes were found, the beach was scoured for hours on end, night and day, without the help of Mr. Pontellier who, although returned from business because of Edna’s disappearance, believed his foolish wife had simply run away for a few days. “I have no worries,” he replied. “She will return. It is only a spell she is passing through, and if this is what it takes to get it out of her system, then so be it.”

Mariequita was alone when she found Edna sprawled across the sand with her arms and legs flung in uncanny contortions. The woman who had once been a wife and mother was now broken along the shore, comparable to a small child lazing innocently in the weak sunlight— perhaps too stubborn or deaf to obey its mother’s orders to put its clothes back on. Mariequita stared only for a moment as she dug her muddy feet into the grainy sand, wondering whether Edna had really only dipped her toes into the water and been carried away by surprise, or if she had voluntarily swam out to sea in hopes of being carried away.



From Scott G.F. Bailey:

It was not far to the General Post Office on Sackville Street, but because he knew that Mr. O’Hagan would have left the office before his errand was done, Malone took his time walking through downtown. The weather had turned hot and humid and he had no desire to be soaked with sweat by the time he returned to work. In fact, Malone had no desire to return to work at all. Finnerty’s funeral had soured his thoughts for the day. He wandered at random through the crowded streets for some time, paused briefly to look up at the afternoon sun and then carried the package into a pub a block north of the post office.

Malone ordered a pint of stout, paying out of O’Hagan’s half-crown. The parcel lay on the table before him, addressed to Finnerty’s nephew in London. He remembered now that Finnerty had, before dying, written to this nephew but had not posted the letter and that the parcel contained something he’d left to the nephew in his will. He should have remembered the contents of both the letter and the parcel; he’d sat and listened as O’Hagan read Finnerty’s will aloud not a day earlier. But for the last several months Malone had been sleepwalking through his days, acting more out of habit than will. He frequently took breaks from copying or filing documents to scratch out short lists. In his coat pocket, in fact, was one such list he’d scribbled that very morning.



From Anne Gallagher:

As they drew closer to the old house, William hobbled the horses in a small clearing about twenty feet off the path. The two men moved stealthily through the remaining brush and came to rest in the back of the house.

"There’s someone in there, smoke from the chimney," Peter whispered. He pointed to a single stack.

Downstairs, the curtained windows hid any signs of life. William kept his eye on the second floor and was rewarded by a slight movement from the corner room.

"Up there," William whispered and pointed to the window. His heart almost broke when John appeared at the pane. How were they going to get his attention and where were the others?

"Now what, sir?" Peter looked to William for the answer.

"I don’t know. I'm going around front to see what that holds, then we'll come up with a plan. You stay here and if there’s any way you can get John's attention without being seen, do it." William crouched and made his way on his belly through the underbrush around to the front of the house.

Heavy curtains draped the front windows as well. An overgrown garden stood off to one side of the manison. A barely discernable drive led through another wilderness in the opposite direction. Two horses grazed in a field a short distance from the house. There was no barn, any outbuildings to use as cover, or people.



From Domey Malasarn:

The abductions started around the same time Trish met Scott. The first night it happened, Trish had been driving home on Interstate 7 after the couple’s second date. They had gone to a seafood restaurant, a place where Scott’s family celebrated all of their major milestones. She associated Scott with the aliens for a time, so blurry was her memory due to the lack of sleep. All of it had seemed extraterrestrial, not just the aliens, but the idea of being in love with Scott...the idea of being in love at all. On the night she lost her virginity to Scott, she knew that the aliens were watching.

There were two types of beings on the spaceship. (She hated that she now used words like "beings" and "spaceship".) One was a translucent humanoid form, the other like deshelled oysters: small, globular, mucoidal. The oysters slid around on the floor in glossy heaps, sometimes gathering in the corners as they conferred with one another. It was these oysters that seemed to be in charge of everything. The humanoids did all the work, but they were dumb. When they wanted Trish to raise her arms, they would raise their own arms. If she didn’t comply right away, more of them would raise their arms. In her most frightening moments—climbing onto the table, parting her legs for the probes—she felt as if she was surrounded by a tai chi class. She wasn’t even sure they were actually alive, these humanoids; they could have had motors inside them for all she knew. The oysters were the patient watchers. The oysters were the masterminds.



And now the Mystery Excerpts!

Number One:

I am homesick, Olivia thought. I miss Ali, his breath sweet with dates and almonds and his hair foolishly scented with English pomade like a cheap mobster. I miss the gap between your front teeth, she thought. What am I to do with you, Ali Ali Ali? Your name sounds like the wailing of Arab mothers at a funeral, and I hope you are being cautious. Algiers is a dangerous city, especially for men who take employment with the French oppressors.

A wind came up and Olivia made to snatch the wine glass from the window but she mistook the distance and knocked the glass off the ledge. It tumbled away out of sight to shatter on a paving stone below. Well, it had not been much of a glass.

Olivia stood and leaned out of the window, into the wind. The nights here were not as warm as she’d imagined they’d be. Her skin constricted in the cold air and she felt brittle, useless anger and the urge to scream out, to howl at the sliver of moon. She pushed her shoes from her feet and was about to pull off her dress and lean naked and foolish out into the frigid salt breeze when she heard the children laughing.



Number Two:

Richard stood on the fore deck of the triple-masted clipper, the spray of the water stinging his face. His heart filled with an immeasurable joy. There was nothing in the world like standing on an ocean-going vessel. The smell of the salt as it stung his nostrils, the heavy wetness encompassing him, almost womblike. The vastness of the water mesmerized him, what was on the other side, what treasure could be found there? He loved the ocean the same way he loved a woman.

As comforting as a mother’s hand with the gentle ebb and flow of the tides, the bob and sway as the vessel moved through the water, almost like sitting in a rocking chair suckling on a breast. The sea could also be as furious as a woman scorned, ranting and wild, a tempestuous fury. As beautiful as any woman he had ever seen, with her myriad of effervescent colors, shimmering or dull, the ever-changing hues of virulent blues and purples to chartreuse and moss to grey. And formed like a woman; the swell of a breast, the curve of a waist, the sway of her hips as she walked away. Yes his only true love was the ocean.



Number Three:

As the cookies baked, she slept and I studied her long, thin body lying limp on the couch. Her eyelashes, frail and skeletal, fluttered against her cheekbones. She was wedged between dream and sleep, unconscious of the fact that I was breathing her in. My heart beat wildly at the remembrance of her taking me into her arms years earlier. I was eleven, and she had whispered into my ear that there would be times I would feel sad, but those times would pass. She caressed my forehead, her hand smelling of lilacs. That was the year he died, my father, her husband. That was the year she began to tremble, the year she hid her red hair behind golden curls, the year she put up the fence. Change advanced gradually—in layers so slight I was only now beginning to see them, and for a brief moment I caught a glimpse of how thick these layers, these gradations of change had become, but another moment of reflection brought me back to the deliberate acceptance I learned years ago.

From the window behind her, bars of yellow light fell across my mother’s closed eyes. For a moment, she was so hushed with some thought wedged in her mind that I could hear the leaves fall outside. It was autumn, a season of change, but with my eyes focused on my mother, I felt as if there would only be one season, one age that would stretch further than I could ever imagine.



Number Four:

He woke to a strange sound. Orange light from a streetlamp below shone up through the blinds and streaked across his bare chest and legs. He panted, as if waking from a nightmare, though he had no memory of any dream. His skin was pricked with heat. The bed sheets were damp. The stench of skunk came in through the open window.

He looked at his room, inverted as it was from his position on the bed. He had knocked over the nightstand and the lamp lay disjointed beside an empty water glass. The bulb had popped when he swatted it to the floor—this he remembered. Bright light and shattered white glass and the coiled fuse dimming from orange to red to black. His alarm clock was still plugged in and he could see the first red digit unobscured by the lamp. It was after two in the morning. He heard again the sound that had woken him. It was a cry in the night, half man and half animal. It was the sound of pain. He groped for his clothes. He stood and stepped over the mess, careful not to cut his feet on the shattered glass.

Below, the rooms were bright in the moonlight and the streetlamp light. He could make out the clear path to the kitchen. He turned on the faucet and cupped his hands under the running water and drank. He reached into the cupboard, found a bottle of aspirin, and took some pills with another swallow from the tap.



And now you tell us who you think wrote what. Save discussion of stylistic indicators leading to your decision for tomorrow, if you will. Please make your decisions before reading the comments! You will be most helpful if you are an unbiased observer! Thanks awfully much!

Monday, May 2, 2011

Cocktails at the Literary Lab



This is the Official Beverage of the Literary Lab: the Moscow Mule. Here's how you make one:

Pour over ice:
1 1/2 shots vodka (we're using Bardenay vodka)
Juice of 1/2 fresh lime
Cock(e) & Bull ginger beer to fill glass

Traditionally these are served in copper mugs, but as you see, we made ours in 200ml Pyrex glass beakers.

Tomorrow: Phase 1 of the Heather/Eels experiment!